![fileloupe raw images fileloupe raw images](https://mars.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00533/mcam/0533MR2111001000E1_DXXX.jpg)
Licensing is tertiary (if that), and in fact I pay for the subscription currently. I use Capture One first and foremost because I love it, and because it works the best for my particular camera systems (personally speaking only). Standard metadata will normally translate, things like star ratings, color tags and the like but that’s about it. The two applications don’t understand one another’s instructions. I can’t edit a raw file in LR and continue editing that same file in Capture One, for example. Bottom line, there are always other considerations when switching, in particular with raw converters, since a set of raw editing instructions in LR won’t translate to another tool. In the grand scheme of things you do have to ask if you’re willing to invest in another company’s ethos and way of doing things because it will be different indeed.
![fileloupe raw images fileloupe raw images](http://wedding-retouching.com/UserFiles/free-raw-photos-for-retouching.jpg)
Like Adobe, Capture One is very opinionated about their software, and there are definitely “differences of opinion” between the two. But they were really used to and loved the way LR did things. And when asked why they switched, it was just because of licensing. That the features they were used to aren’t there or if it has similar ones, they behave differently or…. But then they get grumpy when they find out that Capture One isn’t just trying to ape LR, only with a different licensing philosophy. I participate in some Capture One forums to help out and there are a fair number of LR orphans there who switched simply because of not liking subscription software. Since my images aren't worth printing, I have never bothered with this.Ĭlick to expand.Molly makes a good point that gets overlooked. TIF for instance, and also making changes in the sizing parameters accordingly. If I were to do something else such as wanting to order a print of an image, obviously I'd need to do more with the processing, saving in. This size seems to work well for most web-based discussion forums in which I share images. jpg and that is what I use when posting images on the web. That was in late 2019 and I'm still happy with DXO PhotoLab (now in v.5) so I'm sticking with it! My needs are simple, I'm not into fancy stuff like layers and such.Īs for sizing images in PhotoLab, I simply set the parameters at 300 dpi and 1800 x 1800 pixels highest quality. It wasn't until I hit upon DXO PhotoLab 3 a couple of years ago that I finally began to feel somewhat at home in an editing program, as the layout was understandable and intuitive me and I actually was able to accomplish something without coming away feeling absolutely frustrated. It just didn't match up with my needs and preferences or approach to editing. I tried Pixelmator some years ago and I still have it in the computer but haven't looked at it in a long time.